Campaign Analytics

Deep dive into campaign performance and edge drivers

8 Campaigns · 30 Mar – 21 May 2026

Campaign Health Scorecard

Expectancy

+20.27R
Excellent

Win Rate

75.0%
Excellent

Payoff Ratio

27.35×
Excellent

Profit Factor

82.06
Excellent

Right Tail Presence

2
Good

Executive Insight

Campaign performance remains strongly positive despite a sub-80% win rate due to a 27.35× payoff ratio and 20.27R realized expectancy per campaign. Returns are moderate — the top campaign alone generated 24.7% of total R, confirming significant right-tail dependence. Expansion regime setups deliver 18.83R avg per campaign and represent the primary edge. Pre-determined Exit remains the dominant failure mode and should be monitored closely to protect expectancy.

Campaign Efficiency

75.0%

Win Rate

6 won · 2 lost

27.35×

Payoff Ratio

avg win R : avg loss R

82.06

Profit Factor

total win R : total loss R

Campaign Output

+162.12R

Total R Gained

cumulative across all

+27.35R

Avg Winning

avg R per winning

-1.00R

Avg Losing

avg R per losing

Execution Quality

1.63

Avg Attempts / Campaign

trades taken per setup

2

Right Tail Presence

campaigns >30R

Cumulative R by Campaign

Running RPeak R

Convexity Overview

Skewness

-0.2

Right Tail Campaigns

2

Top 1 Campaign Contribution

24.7%

Top 3 Campaign Contribution

66.4%

Convexity Assessment

Moderate

Returns are driven by a small number of large winners.

Campaign Extremes

Best Campaigns

Setup 6
+40.00R
Setup 7
+37.81R
Setup 8
+29.85R
Setup 4
+26.63R
Setup 1
+17.18R

Worst Campaigns

Setup 2
-1.00R
Setup 3
-1.00R

Best : Worst Magnitude Ratio

40×

Total winning R

+151.47R

Total losing R

-2.00R

R Distribution by Frequency

Distribution Intelligence

Median Campaign

+21.91R

Average Campaign

+20.27R

Skewness

-0.2

Interpretation

Returns are left-skewed. Review strategy for consistency.

Exit Reasons Analysis

Exit ReasonFreqAvg RTotal R
Pre-determined Exit5+19.09R+95.46R
Structural Invalidation1-1R-1R
Panic Exit1+37.81R+37.81R
Reversal Structure Break1+29.85R+29.85R
Total8+20.27R+162.12R

Attempt Efficiency (Win Rate by Attempts)

AttemptsCampaignsWin RateAvg R / Campaign
1 attempt560%+17.01R
2 attempts1100%+26.63R
3 attempts2100%+25.23R

Average Attempts / Campaign

1.63

Return Attribution

Right Tail (>30R)
+77.8R
Normal Winners
+86.3R
Breakeven (0-5R)
+0.0R
Losing
-2.0R
Right Tail (>30R)
+77.8R (2 campaigns)
Normal Winners
+86.3R (4 campaigns)
Breakeven (0-5R)
+0.0R (0 campaigns)
Losing
-2.0R (2 campaigns)

Total R Gained

+162.12R

Campaign Risk Health

Worst Campaign

-1.00R

Setup 2

Avg Losing Campaign

-1.00R

average of 2 losses

Max Drawdown (R)

-2.00R

peak to trough

Max Drawdown Duration

2

campaigns

Max Consecutive Losing

2

campaigns

Drawdown recovered vs total R gained2.00R lost · +162.12R gained
Max DD: -2.00RRecovery Factor: 9.99×

Failure Mode Summary

Exit ReasonCount%
Pre-determined Exit563%
Structural Invalidation113%
Panic Exit113%
Reversal Structure Break113%
Total8100%

Key Takeaways & Actionable Insights

Strong Edge

Positive expectancy (+20.27R) driven by high payoff ratio and moderate returns.

Focus on Quality Setups

1-attempt win rate is 60%. Prioritize high-conviction setups to reduce attempt cost.

Manage Failure Mode

Pre-determined Exit is the #1 cost driver (5 campaigns, 95.5R total). Tighten invalidation criteria.

Leverage Convexity

Top 2 campaigns generated 66.4% of returns. Keep seeking right-tail opportunities.

Monitor Drawdowns

Max drawdown of 2.00R over 2 campaigns. Maintain risk discipline.